From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19076 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2007 14:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 19066 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jan 2007 14:14:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:13:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1FB48CC38 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:13:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23493-01 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:13:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (AStDenis-105-1-75-95.w80-8.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.212.95]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB4348CC2E for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:13:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9142B34C099; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:14:40 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] re-implement make clean & distclean Message-ID: <20070101141440.GC17211@adacore.com> References: <20061231100755.GQ3640@adacore.com> <200612311312.kBVDCA3B000981@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20061231143237.GA3428@adacore.com> <20061231151853.GD16449@nevyn.them.org> <20061231152743.GC3428@adacore.com> <20061231180454.GA21036@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061231180454.GA21036@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > > Fortunately, I only suggest this for gdb.ada, so very few people would > > be impacted. Perhaps the lack of consistency is a bad thing? > > We have the same problem all over the testsuite, really - no one keeps > the makefiles up to date any more. Just to be clear, given the legitimate objections I've heard, I am withdrawing this patch. I'll see how to clean the Makefile up. Thanks to everyone for their feedback. -- Joel