Re: [c++] Pointer to member overhaul

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-31T23:49:42Z

On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 12:55:33AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:40:43 -0500
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > > The sentence "CONTENTS is the bytes forming the pointer to method"
> > > isn't grammatical.
> >
> > Actually I disagree. CONTENTS is a singular noun here, the pointer
> > whose name is "contents".
>
> How about
>
> "CONTENTS is the byte pattern representing the pointer to method."
>
> A similar wording is used a few lines below the one being disputed.

Works for me. Thank you.