Re: [c++] Pointer to member overhaul

Eli Zaretskii
2006-12-31T22:55:43Z

> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:40:43 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > The sentence "CONTENTS is the bytes forming the pointer to method"
> > isn't grammatical.
>
> Actually I disagree. CONTENTS is a singular noun here, the pointer
> whose name is "contents".

How about

"CONTENTS is the byte pattern representing the pointer to method."

A similar wording is used a few lines below the one being disputed.