Re: [c++] Pointer to member overhaul

Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-08T15:52:48Z

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 04:47:40PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Dan Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > I've committed it with Jim's corrections, as below.
> >
> > A nice bonus: the change to gnuv3_get_virtual_fn fixes two Java tests
> > that weren't running before my December testsuite patch.
>
> This also fixes three C++ testcases on s390x-ibm-linux
> that have been failing forever there!

Interesting - which ones? I didn't expect s390x to be affected
but it might have to do with the old definition of the virtual
function pointer check, which hardcoded the number "0x80000000".