Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [commit] Testsuite updates
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200612312035.kBVKZ0jI001086@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061231200905.GA24490@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:09:05 -0500)

> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:09:05 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> This patch fixes or avoids a number of failures on my Debian
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu system.
> 
> I was using a HEAD build of glibc rather than the system's glibc,
> in order to pick up Jan's fix for unwinding information in signal
> handlers.  Having debugging information for the C library caused the
> annota1.exp and annota3.exp failures.

So continueing to printf didn't actually get is to printf?  What's
going on here?

> The selftest.exp patch adds an XFAIL for a GCC bug in my system
> compiler, which I reported several months ago to the GCC bugzilla.
> I'm not optimistic about it getting fixed soon.

A bug in *your* system compiler.  How widespread is this bug?  We
really should be careful with complicating tests to work around
problems in particular GCC versions.

> And finally, for linux-dp.exp, an omission in Nathan's recent change
> generated UNSUPPORTEDs on native GNU/Linux systems, where the test
> should pass.

Can you elaborate?  I mean, what output is genererated that should be
ignored?


  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-31 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-31 20:09 Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-31 20:35 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2006-12-31 20:49   ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200612312035.kBVKZ0jI001086@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox