From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46819-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26842 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2006 13:12:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 26834 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Dec 2006 13:12:21 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:12:16 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBVDCCJH024201; 	Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:12:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBVDCA3B000981; 	Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:12:10 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:12:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200612311312.kBVDCA3B000981@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20061231100755.GQ3640@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker 	on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:07:55 +0400)
Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] re-implement make clean & distclean
References:  <20061231100755.GQ3640@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2

> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:07:55 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The current implementation for make clean requires us that we update
> the EXECUTABLES list each time we add a new testcase. It was a vague
> copy/paste of some code I probably found in one of the nearby Makefiles...
> It was causing me a bit of grief that certain files would not be deleted
> when I did a "make clean", in particular the executables produced by
> gnatmake. I decided to replace this with an approach we have been using
> with great success in our own testsuite for years...
> 
> 2006-12-31  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
>         * gdb.ada/Makefile.in (EXECUTABLES): Delete.
>         (MISCELLANEOUS): Delete.
>         (clean): Re-implement.
>         (mostlyclean): Likewise.
> 
> Tested on my x86-linux laptop.  Any objection?

Hmm, seems a bit scary to me.  If I read this correctly, a file named
NOTES would be wiped isn't it?  I'm using a seperate object dir, so I
probably won't care, but others might...