From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: variable objects and registers
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061230205032.GE25539@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612302340.22697.ghost@cs.msu.su>
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:40:22PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I kinda assumed we'd use 'struct block *' everywhere. We'd need to be
> able to check if a PC is inside a block and for that we'd need the
> comparison with block start and end addresses. Or there's some other
> way to check if PC is in block?
I meant that we shouldn't have the front end specify blocks based on
their start/end addresses. If we want the front end to be able to
specify blocks, we can give them UIDs.
Yes, BLOCK_START and BLOCK_END are currently the right way to check
if an address is in a block. I posted a patch a while back that
added a predicate function to check, in case the block had more than
one range of instructions. I never finished that patch - my goal
for my own GDB development over the next year is to finish all the
stuff I've posted as prototypes and then never come back to!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-30 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-06 10:57 Nick Roberts
2006-12-19 17:59 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-19 21:58 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-20 18:39 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-20 20:34 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-21 1:34 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-21 6:34 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-21 7:57 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-21 8:34 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-30 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-30 20:41 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-30 20:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-12-30 23:05 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-21 6:43 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-21 8:34 ` Nick Roberts
[not found] ` <0E190425-7C4F-4C6E-B8B3-9A3FA79F6FE3@apple.com>
2006-12-21 23:30 ` Nick Roberts
[not found] ` <1B6B17FA-65DE-4CE2-9BE0-20DA74780EEA@apple.com>
2006-12-22 4:47 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-22 6:23 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-22 6:51 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-22 7:30 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-01-05 9:04 ` Vladimir Prus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-29 17:21 Vladimir Prus
2006-12-05 21:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-06 9:25 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-12-19 22:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061230205032.GE25539@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox