From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20704 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2006 15:52:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 20695 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Dec 2006 15:52:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:52:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 6058 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2006 15:52:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.223.157?) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 26 Dec 2006 15:52:03 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [doc] improve MI varobj introduction Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:52:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200612191103.55137.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200612210914.45128.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20061226153206.GA16188@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20061226153206.GA16188@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612261851.55429.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 26 December 2006 18:32, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:14:43AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > > > Also expanding the introduction allows the removal of the summary of > > > > > commands which just duplicates what comes after. > > > > > > > > I'm not sure -- which summaries can be removed now? > > > > > > The list just after: > > > > > > The following is the complete set of GDB/MI operations... > > > > I don't have an opinion. If the list was clickable, it would be useful, but it's not, > > and I don't know if info can be persuaded that make them clickable (and not > > very interested to change that, anyway) > > It can be, if you use @xref or @pxref. There's plenty of examples in > the manual. They're already marked with @findex, which I think > suffices - try @xref{-var-list-children}. Okay. Anyway, this is a separate change. > I didn't really follow this thread, but I would recommend posting a > revised version of the patch with any changes when you're ready to. I don't have any planned changes so far, except for three-word editorial change suggested by Nick. - Volodya