Re: [doc] improve MI varobj introduction

Eli Zaretskii
2007-01-09T04:18:59Z

> From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:08:33 +0300
>
> Again, "that have built-in types" sounds to me like restrictive clause,
> as if there are leaf variables that don't have builtin-types. What about:
>
> Recursion ends when we reach leaf variable objects, which always have
> built-in types.

Fine with me. (I don't really see the difference between this
sentence and what I wrote.)

> I attach the revised patch, incorporating those two corrections,
> and using the above last sentence. Is it OK, or would you prefer
> your original sentence?

It's okay, thanks.