From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11738 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2006 15:32:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 11729 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Dec 2006 15:32:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:32:14 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GzEHe-0004Fo-8E; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:32:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [doc] improve MI varobj introduction Message-ID: <20061226153206.GA16188@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200612191103.55137.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200612201446.31705.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <17801.41350.896824.320649@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200612210914.45128.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612210914.45128.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:14:43AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > > Also expanding the introduction allows the removal of the summary of > > > > commands which just duplicates what comes after. > > > > > > I'm not sure -- which summaries can be removed now? > > > > The list just after: > > > > The following is the complete set of GDB/MI operations... > > I don't have an opinion. If the list was clickable, it would be useful, but it's not, > and I don't know if info can be persuaded that make them clickable (and not > very interested to change that, anyway) It can be, if you use @xref or @pxref. There's plenty of examples in the manual. They're already marked with @findex, which I think suffices - try @xref{-var-list-children}. I didn't really follow this thread, but I would recommend posting a revised version of the patch with any changes when you're ready to. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery