From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9505 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2006 22:02:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 9497 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2006 22:02:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:02:49 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gwn2s-0002WP-EN; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:02:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: variable objects and registers Message-ID: <20061219220246.GA9678@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200611292020.47109.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20061205211607.GB28333@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:19:57PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Ehm, note that the test for -data-list-register-names only works for Sparc. > I must admit I don't know how to test this behaviour in a generic fashion. > It might be possible to compare output of -data-list-register-names > and -var-registers, but given that the latter is implemented by cloning > some logic of the former, that's weak test. BTW, I meant something much simpler when I asked for a testcase: test that it creates a bunch of varobjs. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery