Re: [patch] Indirect access to GDB history variables

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:45:58PM -0800, Steve Rodrigues wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote on Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:45:08PM -0500:
> > > > I think that we should take the long-postponed jump to embedding
> > > > scripting languages, rather than adding more complexity to the existing
> > > > CLI.
> > > 
> 
> ...[further discussion]...
> 
> I assume that with the embedded scripting language, you'd allow input in a 
> 'interpreted' fashion; i.e. at the gdb prompt I could enter a Perl or 
> Python or Guile command directly, accessing (for example, with Perl) @history or 
> $history[$i]?

Probably not that simply, no, but there would be some interaction.
This is one of the things I don't know how it would work yet :-)

> Would the embedded language support current CLI scripts or not?
> I.e. if I have Perl-GDB, can I run my existing GDB scripts or only
> Perl-ized versions of them?  (We have quite a large pile and
> migrating them to something else probably won't happen, at least in
> any reasonable timeframe.)

Yes, definitely, no CLI support would be removed.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery