From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1120 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2006 08:46:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 1112 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2006 08:46:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ranger.systems.pipex.net (HELO ranger.systems.pipex.net) (62.241.162.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:46:38 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.242] (81-178-15-87.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.15.87]) by ranger.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256ABE000156; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:46:34 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Hudson To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: PATCH: Provde a pid to filename conversion for NetBSD Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; References: <200611301323.18743.skrll@netbsd.org> <200612151623.30618.skrll@netbsd.org> <20061215163730.GA9822@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20061215163730.GA9822@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612160846.31929.skrll@netbsd.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 On Friday 15 December 2006 16:37, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:23:30PM +0000, Nick Hudson wrote: > > > 2006-11-30 Nick Hudson > > > > > > * i386nbsd-nat.c: Include "nbsd-nat.h". > > > (_initialize_i386nbsd_nat): Update target vector to use > > > nbsd_pid_to_exec_file. > > > > > > * config/i386/nbsdelf.mh (NATDEPFILES): Add nbsd-nat.o > > > > > > * nbsd-nat.c: New file. > > > * nbsd-nat.h: New file. > > > * Makefile.in (ALLDEPFILES): Add nbsd-nat.c. > > > (nbsd_nat_h): New variable. > > > (nbsd-nat.o): New dependency. > > > > What needs to happen for this to go in? > > Someone needs to review it. I was hoping that someone who actually > used NetBSD would speak up :-) If no one does, I'll do it myself. I sent Jason Thorpe (current NetBSD maintainer) an email, but got not response. :( > It looks generally fine. Is this going to work for every NetBSD > platform? Should it be added to all of them, rather than just i386? > Looks like GDB supports 11. I have diffs to add support to all other NetBSD platforms which I committed to the NetBSD tree recently. I'll send those after this one goes in. Thanks, Nick