From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29365 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2006 20:29:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 29356 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2006 20:29:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:29:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA4748CFD6; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:29:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19984-01-6; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:29:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FF148CE9D; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:29:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 907FA34C099; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:30:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: fix base members in references Message-ID: <20061206203016.GA30520@adacore.com> References: <200611291555.42209.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20061205204447.GC25572@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 Volodya, > >> If this patch is fine, can I also commit it to 6.6 branch? The bug in > >> question is quite problematic for C++ code. > > > > Sounds fine to me, but check with Joel. > > I'll check. This patch: > 2006-12-06 Vladimir Prus > > * varobj.c (cplus_value_of_child): When accessing > base suboject, don't specially process references. is OK for the branch. Do we have a testcase for that, btw? -- Joel