From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1159 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2006 20:45:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1151 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2006 20:44:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:44:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Grh9j-00076i-Ik; Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:44:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:45:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: fix base members in references Message-ID: <20061205204447.GC25572@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200611291555.42209.ghost@cs.msu.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611291555.42209.ghost@cs.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:55:42PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > The attached patch fixed the problem, no regression. I'll write a testcase for > it as soon as my previous references patch is reviewed -- I don't want to > pile too many testcases in as-yet-uncommitted file. > > OK? OK, with a changelog entry. > If this patch is fine, can I also commit it to 6.6 branch? The bug in question > is quite problematic for C++ code. Sounds fine to me, but check with Joel. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery