From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6972 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2006 18:59:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 6962 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2006 18:59:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:59:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C8248CC25; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:59:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06892-01-2; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDD348CBE4; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C81A634C099; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:59:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "H. J. Lu" , GDB , jkratoch@redhat.com, bug-readline@gnu.org, chet.ramey@case.edu Subject: Re: PATCH: PR tui/2173: Arrow keys no longer works in breakpoint command list Message-ID: <20061202185952.GB32651@adacore.com> References: <20061121213205.GA13310@lucon.org> <20061128164658.GB20882@nevyn.them.org> <20061128165844.GA13667@lucon.org> <20061202184344.GA2197@lucon.org> <20061202185548.GA11402@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061202185548.GA11402@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 > > PR tui/2173 > > * readline.c (readline): Unset and reset RL_STATE_CALLBACK if > > needed. > > This looks reasonable to me; I was wrong about longjmp since Readline's > signal handlers will be installed. If Chet accepts this or a similar > fix for the next release of readline, then you can apply it to our > copy. Assuming that Chet takes it for readline, do you think we can/should put this in the branch as well? Thanks, -- Joel