From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6036 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2006 14:08:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 6019 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2006 14:08:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:08:36 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Goh9u-00008T-8E; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:08:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nathan Sidwell Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: trace tests & m68k Message-ID: <20061127140834.GB32528@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nathan Sidwell , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <456AB38A.9030504@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <456AB38A.9030504@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:44:42AM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Now, this patch simply disables the m68k specific code, but I'm open to > suggestions on what board specific variable should be tested -- perhaps > d490_binfile? Perhaps set something in config/m68k-emc.exp, which seems to be related? Added at the same time, anyway. Or, we could just garbage collect this code. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery