From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25825 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2006 19:25:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 25811 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2006 19:25:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:25:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C003B48CDF0; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:24:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03172-01-3; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:24:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6CB48CC00; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:24:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 176FD34C099; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:25:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: SPU port for GDB 6.6? Message-ID: <20061124192520.GA3416@adacore.com> References: <200611231404.kANE4HAl010976@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611231404.kANE4HAl010976@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 (sorry for the delay, I tried to review the changes to the common parts as carefully as possible) > I was wondering whether there was any chance to get the new SPU port > into the GDB 6.6 release as well. > > It's mostly target-specific code, but does require some minor > changes to common code. We would be talking about the following > set of patches (already committed to mainline): > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00231.html > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00256.html > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00134.html > > Would it be OK to apply those to the 6.6 branch at this stage? The above 3 patches are OK for the branch. > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00251.html This patch (gdbserver) look ok as far as I'm concerned. It seems sufficiently obvious in the common bits it is touching, so I don't think Daniel would object to that. Go ahead and commit, it's simple enough to back out if he (or someone else!) does. -- Joel