From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12985 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2006 19:28:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 12975 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2006 19:28:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:47 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gmxm1-0003Aq-7u for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:28:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA][2/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (valops.c fix) Message-ID: <20061122192845.GA12105@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200611111838.kABIcHaZ031319@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20061122142300.GA1120@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:25:48AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > > VALUE_TO_REGISTER has only one caller and eight definitions (plus some > > documentation). It shouldn't be hard to update it. What additional > > information do you need? Would passing the two values instead of one > > regnum and one contents do it? > > Or, possibly another gdbarch method, VALUE_TO_REGISTER_BITFIELD, which > can be left unset, provoking an internal error in value_assign? I'm not even quite sure how bitfields come into it. The register type's a builtin_type_vec128. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery