From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6778 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2006 16:11:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6770 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2006 16:11:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:11:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmuhS-0001Of-V5; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:11:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA][5/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (testsuite tweaks) Message-ID: <20061122161150.GA5324@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20061122142705.GB1120@nevyn.them.org> <200611221454.kAMEsHIM022043@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611221454.kAMEsHIM022043@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:54:17PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > How much of this still applies, now that you're building GDB using a > > cross configuration triplet? I would imagine isnative now fails. > > They all still apply. However, you've got a point with isnative -- > the gdb.gdb testcases don't currently use it however. Maybe they > should? The following patch works as well as the original ... Could you check both is_remote and isnative, please? The tests don't work with remote targets (because they send "run -nw" directly to GDB). They could be made to, but only if not noargs, and noargs is currently set for gdbserver so there's not much point. Patch is OK with that change. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery