From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7145 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2006 14:27:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 7131 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2006 14:27:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:27:09 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gmt45-0000LT-4D; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:27:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA][5/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (testsuite tweaks) Message-ID: <20061122142705.GB1120@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200611111840.kABIeGfq032402@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611111840.kABIeGfq032402@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:40:16PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Hello, > > this adds a couple of tweaks related to SPU to the testsuite. In particular, > the following tests are disabled for the SPU: > > gdb.base/attach.exp > -- because the runtime library doesn't provide "sleep" > > gdb.base/term.exp > -- because we don't support command line arguments (by default) > > gdb.cp/bs145503.exp > gdb.cp/exception.exp > gdb.cp/userdef.exp > -- because the executables are too big to execute on the SPU > (they pull in a lot of stuff from the libstdc++ library) > > gdb.gdb/complaints.exp > gdb.gdb/selftest.exp > gdb.gdb/observer.exp > gdb.gdb/xfullpath.exp > -- because the GDB executable is built for PowerPC and doesn't run on > the SPU (even though GDB considers the Cell BE configuration to be > 'native') > > OK? How much of this still applies, now that you're building GDB using a cross configuration triplet? I would imagine isnative now fails. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery