From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4052 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2006 18:29:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 3970 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2006 18:29:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:29:30 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmDtQ-00066q-Vn; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:29:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove obsolete info in README (remote-vx) Message-ID: <20061120182920.GA23447@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20061120180707.GF3329@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061120180707.GF3329@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:07:07AM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > The paragraph I propose to delete mentions that this code can be > used as an example for communication via ethernet. Do we have > another such example? Is this still relevant? (could we use ser-tcp > in the remote stub for instance?) If you want to communicate with a remote device over ethernet, nowadays, we recommend - or at least I do! - using the standard remote.c protocol. I think your patch is fine. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery