From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11459 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2006 04:20:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 11450 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2006 04:20:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:20:50 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Gm0eC-0007dA-9z; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:20:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR mi/2077 "set edit off" breaks MI Message-ID: <20061120042044.GA29293@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17719.15772.325330.48627@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061117213449.GC13961@nevyn.them.org> <17761.5066.494599.865067@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17761.5066.494599.865067@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 03:32:42PM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > This patch is taken out of the async patch. It's probably a good idea to > > > commit the different parts separately anyway. > > > > Definitely. > > I can split it into one async patch (the largest part) and several small MI > patches. The MI patches are probably quite safe changes and the async part > shouldn't interfere with normal use. Unless Elena becomes active again, I > think it's likely that you will be the only person who would want to/be willing > to review the latter. You have suggested that you would also like to use it > for other reasons. When you have time to review it please tell me and I will > re-submit it (without the MI changes). We've branched; you have a patch ready; let's get it going! I'd be glad to see this merged. I'm afraid I really haven't looked at what you have so far; could you post a current patch that I can experiment with? I'll try to look at it during this week. > I'll ask RMS, I've always been told that the committer's name should not be > the one to go in the changelog. True, but you've updated the patch and in general done more work on it; the next best thing would probably be to either use Jim's name, or ask him whose name to use. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery