From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24081 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2006 22:46:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 24071 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2006 22:46:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:46:26 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GlCTS-0004pp-HW; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:46:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:46:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: andrzej zaborowski , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] interpreter-exec error path Message-ID: <20061117224618.GA18529@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , andrzej zaborowski , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17669.56882.234172.157983@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060916040928.GC7673@nevyn.them.org> <17675.50442.412240.290782@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061117211730.GB13961@nevyn.them.org> <17758.14635.501210.776823@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17758.14635.501210.776823@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 11:35:23AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > > We stop executing a CLI script if one command fails; I think the same > > > > should apply here? > > > > > > OK, I'll do that if you're agreeable and remove exception_print so each > > > error only gets reported once. > > > > Hi Nick, > > > > I had this message flagged in my inbox, but reading it, I can't > > remember why. Did you need anything from me in this thread? > > Just that you agree to the corresponding change to MI before I submit a patch. Is it just the behavior of a second command on the interpreter-exec line after the first errors? If so, I thought I had already agreed; I don't think continuing there is useful. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery