From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24212 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2006 18:14:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 24167 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2006 18:14:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:14:02 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Gl8Dv-0001p6-1i; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:13:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: frozen variable objects Message-ID: <20061117181359.GC6133@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17756.56523.353271.828046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17756.56523.353271.828046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:48:59AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > gdb_value_fetch_lazy"). However, I would just suggest that these changes are > made shortly after the release of GDB 6.6. That way there is time test them > with frontends that might be using GDB/MI while GDB is still in CVS. While I disagree with this as a general position (see my later messages), it's now irrelevant: trunk is past the branchpoint :-) I don't think this would be appropriate to add to a release branch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery