Re: QPassSignals patch to go with proposed protocol

Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-27T08:11:28Z

> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:33:44 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> > > +@cindex inform remote target of signals passed to the inferior
> >
> > This index entry is too long.
>
> Is this better?
>
> @cindex inform remote target of unnecessary signals

Is the ``inform'' part really necessary? How about this instead?

@cindex remote target, signals to ignore

Other than that, the new text is okay with me. Thanks.