Re: [RFA][3/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (the port itself)

Ulrich Weigand
2006-11-22T14:13:05Z

Mark Kettenis wrote:

> > I've now also tried out yet another alternative approach, which avoids
> > the ptrace_ops_hack problem by supporting only the spu target again.
> >
> > It still cleanly separates out target vs. host files. However, it does
> > require a change to configure.ac to allow configure.host to specify that
> > a configuration should be treated as "native" even though host != target.
> >
> > This patch does work as well as the original one. Would this (or
> > something along those lines) also be acceptable?
>
> This looks fine to me. Thanks!

I've committed the patch now. Many thanks for reviewing!

Should I add the port to MAINTAINERS?

Bye,
Ulrich

--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com