Re: [RFA][3/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (the port itself)

Mark Kettenis
2006-11-21T21:32:16Z

> I've now also tried out yet another alternative approach, which avoids
> the ptrace_ops_hack problem by supporting only the spu target again.
>
> It still cleanly separates out target vs. host files. However, it does
> require a change to configure.ac to allow configure.host to specify that
> a configuration should be treated as "native" even though host != target.
>
> This patch does work as well as the original one. Would this (or
> something along those lines) also be acceptable?

This looks fine to me. Thanks!

Mark