From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29286 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2006 16:37:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 29276 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2006 16:37:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:37:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C32F48CF6C for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:37:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02219-01-2 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:37:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323D748CDDF for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:37:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 425D934C099; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:37:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/sparc] Fix step-bt.exp: backtrace after second instruction step Message-ID: <20061109163732.GB3505@adacore.com> References: <20061109045801.GK3582@adacore.com> <20061109130010.GA1625@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061109130010.GA1625@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 > > I encountered on sparc the same problem I saw on i386: When scanning > > a function prologue, if an instruction is replaced by a breakpoint, > > we read the breakpoint instead of reading the original instruction. > > > > Fixed using the same method as in i386... > > OK. Thank you. Checked in. -- Joel