From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27385 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2006 17:23:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 27374 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2006 17:23:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from phoenix.bawue.net (HELO mail.bawue.net) (193.7.176.60) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:23:14 +0000 Received: from lagash (intrt.mips-uk.com [194.74.144.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bawue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5841EB81CF for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:23:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from ths by lagash with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GhUfK-0003lz-S0 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:23:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:23:00 -0000 From: Thiemo Seufer To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use bfd_vma for bfd addresses. Message-ID: <20061107172314.GG19541@networkno.de> References: <20061107131722.GC19541@networkno.de> <20061107150240.GA16014@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061107150240.GA16014@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:17:22PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > the appended patch uses bfd_vma instead of SIM_ADDR for bfd addresses. > > This prevents breaking the sign extension of addresses on mips. > > > > Ok to apply? > > What's the difference - is SIM_ADDR 32-bit? Yes. > A test case for this would be nice if there isn't one already. I'll see what I can come up with. Thiemo