From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18256 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2006 15:02:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 18106 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2006 15:02:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:02:42 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GhSTI-0004Af-Eg; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:02:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use bfd_vma for bfd addresses. Message-ID: <20061107150240.GA16014@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thiemo Seufer , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20061107131722.GC19541@networkno.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061107131722.GC19541@networkno.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:17:22PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Hello All, > > the appended patch uses bfd_vma instead of SIM_ADDR for bfd addresses. > This prevents breaking the sign extension of addresses on mips. > > Ok to apply? What's the difference - is SIM_ADDR 32-bit? A test case for this would be nice if there isn't one already. > 2006-11-07 Thiemo Seufer > > * sim-base.h (text_start, text_end, start_addr): Use bfd_vma type > for bfd text addresses. OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery