From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-45991-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17035 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2006 20:17:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 17027 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2006 20:17:47 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:17:34 +0000
Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BD920AE6; 	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:17:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Datoda <datoda@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [rfa] Handle amd64-linux %orig_rax
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:17:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <20061031201042.71435.qmail@web53713.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061031201042.71435.qmail@web53713.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200610312117.16512.ak@suse.de>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2

On Tuesday 31 October 2006 21:10, Datoda wrote:
> I think i386 shouldn't have the same problems, as far as gdb inferior calls are concerned, because arguments are passed in stack rather than in registers. 

Syscalls always use registers (except argument 6 on SYSENTER) 

-Andi