Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11T20:39:36Z

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:34:38PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the
> > > expected
> > > > > address
> > > > > warning: the wrong version of the shared library may have been found
> > > >
> > > > Such a change is a good idea, I think.
> > > >
> > > > We could make it shorter, though:
> > > >
> > > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the
> > > expected
> > > > address (wrong version of the shared library?)
> > >
> > > I like the change too, but I prefer Daniel's version. I find it much
> > > clearer.
> >
> > Actually, I like Eli's version better, myself. If you find the longer
> > one clearer, could you try to explain why?
>
> I prefer Eli's version. I also think that if further explanation
> beyond Eli's version is required the proper place really is the manual.

Would you all be happy with this compromise?

warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected
address (wrong shared library found?)

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery