Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-11T20:51:36Z

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:49:17PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > I prefer Eli's version. I also think that if further explanation
> > > beyond Eli's version is required the proper place really is the manual.
> >
> > Would you all be happy with this compromise?
> >
> > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected
> > address (wrong shared library found?)
>
> Ah, I must have been unclear. This message is fine with me. It's just
> messages that are significantly longer than that, that I want to ban
> to the manual.

I agree; my original version was too wordy. I'll have to move the
warnings around to get this, but it will be easy, and I agree that the
concise warning is more useful.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery