From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29458 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2006 14:39:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29450 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2006 14:39:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:39:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94FA48CEA0; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:39:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13853-01-3; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:39:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4964B48CBB9; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:39:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 7EEF647F00; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:39:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: drow@false.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning Message-ID: <20061012143907.GH1059@adacore.com> References: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> <20061010213438.GC1059@adacore.com> <20061011133756.GB25164@nevyn.them.org> <9704.82.92.89.47.1160598745.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20061011203928.GA9409@nevyn.them.org> <20061012055231.GG1059@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 > How about this, then: > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected address > (wrong library or library version mismatch?) Sure, I think that works. > I agree, but many users don't bother to look up the message in the > manual, so I think we should make it as clear as possible. That's true. -- Joel