From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23721 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2006 20:51:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 23713 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2006 20:51:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:51:31 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GXl2x-0002Xq-FM; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:51:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning Message-ID: <20061011205123.GA9760@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> <20061010213438.GC1059@adacore.com> <20061011133756.GB25164@nevyn.them.org> <9704.82.92.89.47.1160598745.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20061011203928.GA9409@nevyn.them.org> <17946.82.92.89.47.1160599757.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17946.82.92.89.47.1160599757.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:49:17PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > I prefer Eli's version. I also think that if further explanation > > > beyond Eli's version is required the proper place really is the manual. > > > > Would you all be happy with this compromise? > > > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected > > address (wrong shared library found?) > > Ah, I must have been unclear. This message is fine with me. It's just > messages that are significantly longer than that, that I want to ban > to the manual. I agree; my original version was too wordy. I'll have to move the warnings around to get this, but it will be easy, and I agree that the concise warning is more useful. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery