From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17479 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2006 20:39:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 17471 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2006 20:39:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:39:32 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GXkrQ-0002TQ-I6; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:39:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning Message-ID: <20061011203928.GA9409@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> <20061010213438.GC1059@adacore.com> <20061011133756.GB25164@nevyn.them.org> <9704.82.92.89.47.1160598745.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9704.82.92.89.47.1160598745.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:34:38PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the > > > expected > > > > > address > > > > > warning: the wrong version of the shared library may have been found > > > > > > > > Such a change is a good idea, I think. > > > > > > > > We could make it shorter, though: > > > > > > > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the > > > expected > > > > address (wrong version of the shared library?) > > > > > > I like the change too, but I prefer Daniel's version. I find it much > > > clearer. > > > > Actually, I like Eli's version better, myself. If you find the longer > > one clearer, could you try to explain why? > > I prefer Eli's version. I also think that if further explanation > beyond Eli's version is required the proper place really is the manual. Would you all be happy with this compromise? warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected address (wrong shared library found?) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery