From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1530 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2006 13:38:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 1519 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2006 13:38:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:38:00 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GXeHU-0006fm-Ho; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:37:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning Message-ID: <20061011133756.GB25164@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> <20061010213438.GC1059@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061010213438.GC1059@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:34:38PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected > > > address > > > warning: the wrong version of the shared library may have been found > > > > Such a change is a good idea, I think. > > > > We could make it shorter, though: > > > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected > > address (wrong version of the shared library?) > > I like the change too, but I prefer Daniel's version. I find it much > clearer. Actually, I like Eli's version better, myself. If you find the longer one clearer, could you try to explain why? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery