From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9066 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2006 21:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 9056 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2006 21:34:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:34:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25DD48CBDC; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07895-01-9; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2296548CBBD; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 9F1F947F00; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning Message-ID: <20061010213438.GC1059@adacore.com> References: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected > > address > > warning: the wrong version of the shared library may have been found > > Such a change is a good idea, I think. > > We could make it shorter, though: > > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected > address (wrong version of the shared library?) I like the change too, but I prefer Daniel's version. I find it much clearer. -- Joel