From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1078 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2006 05:51:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 1069 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2006 05:51:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:51:19 +0000 Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446436479C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8268 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 01:50:00 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 01:50:00 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [patch ping] change lookup order of $localvars to happen before symbol tables Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200608200903.07185.vapier@gentoo.org> <200609170022.09732.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060917151051.GA21071@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060917151051.GA21071@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6242343.uyCVHyMtqH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609270151.14652.vapier@gentoo.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 --nextPart6242343.uyCVHyMtqH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 1001 On Sunday 17 September 2006 11:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:22:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > Would you mind resubmitting with those changes? > > > > sure, ive attached two versions ... the first is just the previous patch > > with your requested changes while the second is that plus breaking up t= he > > internal_lookup() function into lookup_only_internal() and > > create_internal() ... doesnt matter to me which of these patches are > > accepted as they both accomplish my original goal :) > > Nice. The second one is OK. There's one small problem; I don't think > we get to call a patch of this size trivial, and I don't see a > copyright assignment for you on file. Am I missing one? If not, I > think I have to ask you to put one in place. looks like one of my mail systems ate your reply :/ seems the ADI lawyers are taking their sweet time with the GDB assignment s= o=20 i'll do another patch ping when things are in place what a pita ;) -mike --nextPart6242343.uyCVHyMtqH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 827 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARRoRUkFjO5/oN/WBAQJgTxAAkgNwu0myhco38Mnl0zMbaHS51naadb07 vducgRHbeV41bVZ3mviWnKi1VRD8keGbqOQyKZHZCGUcBkF4q/JINSCtBN7OPaVH CvByTRKT9pa1Ck9wIyCkaHoZp3eRCSAbNkD2OKQ4aBOPQWsD1QoLe3v4rfh0ES8s cFUse4+BjxSI4SjnmxL8FwIOwgEJquHnogPqAgiuSSem5jO3Pd1msZFYn6Tows/s L1K5WbWc92mcXN2Lzl+HdsPZHoS4+P2N/Yw5T7+3sMhzPO0UhTVpFLcW0M2P2Eqi /dVbtBmKgbVUaZiTtkhnT5+3gqkj+M8cF89uOduWUTLYzP7AhVcDdRwHmquoX/SA Oh+6lfk1P5v4eQRygnN4E4WOocE/T4RG9eCHVoZeIzJ6u5KTJWcsYJCNcy8tstRS tSYmKPg543ftUwJuOMAtLrocV3iVNvfSV1Nj6vO3Ik+dFjzDEnn63jslJDs2d8Bb 30H30E9n0CTbIjfFe9y6nDm/G/qlvyeL648IjUclTOtF3V8o/VpZiC3NGTIqouXs a4QmB4ByWFWHO70Kq8D+/cjt3UXDY+IfTi2MPCmkrQAbSl6Vs/MY5uOymjB+eIBE RVSA3/i84NZkiw3ezNlU25D2D+tacAjyHW9ndWTBvxe3pIV47GCNB7BsTNkueAEC O39EEspvTV0= =KdDi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6242343.uyCVHyMtqH--