From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10795 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2006 01:06:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 10782 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2006 01:05:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:05:57 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8N15IPT022862; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:05:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8N15Ipl006019; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:05:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k8N15Hf7015324; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200609230105.k8N15Hf7015324@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: Michael.Snyder@palmsource.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060913203043.GB21009@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:30:43 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFC] h8300 "info registers" fix References: <0F4DF2E21F33DD46BE7B8CDEEB0E16D307EAB2@ussunex01.palmsource.com> <20060913200917.GA20574@nevyn.them.org> <0F4DF2E21F33DD46BE7B8CDEEB0E16D307EAB3@ussunex01.palmsource.com> <20060913203043.GB21009@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:30:43 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 01:20:09PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > > Grumble -- is the regcache kept in host order, or target order? > > Target order. > > [Which is apparently a bit weird; most debug interfaces I've seen > lately use host order.] Not weird at all; it's the same convention we use for storing values. Bet most debug interfaces you've seen lately actually use little-endian byte order. Mark