From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15319 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2006 08:39:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 15266 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2006 08:39:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su (HELO zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su) (158.250.17.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:38:59 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1GLbsx-0007IX-PY for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:38:57 +0400 Received: from wind.lvk.cs.msu.su ([158.250.17.9]) by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GLbsn-0007GS-Pv; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:38:41 +0400 From: Vladimir Prus To: Nick Roberts Subject: Re: -stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:39:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17664.40625.696162.335382@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200609081027.50966.ghost@cs.msu.su> <17665.10637.505524.563052@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <17665.10637.505524.563052@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609081238.41600.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 On Friday 08 September 2006 12:27, Nick Roberts wrote: > > Here we go, OK? > > Looks fine to me apart from: > > + > > + mi_gdb_test "235-stack-list-arguments 1 1 3" \ > > ^^^ (should be 300?) Yes, you're right. - Volodya