From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6094 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2006 23:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 6084 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2006 23:10:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:10:17 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GLT0b-0005ce-RS; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:10:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes Message-ID: <20060907231009.GA21525@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17664.40625.696162.335382@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17664.40625.696162.335382@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:35:29AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > > Checked in. > > I can't remember that far back but was there any reason for not making the same > change to -stack-list-arguments? There wasn't; if -stack-list-arguments has the same problem, could one of you post a patch to remove the error? TIA! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery