From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29511 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2006 17:01:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 29483 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Aug 2006 17:01:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-248-179-229.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.229) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:01:37 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 8004613C042; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:35:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mingw-patches@lists.sourceforge.net, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Simplify MinGW canadian crosses Message-ID: <20060829170135.GC17552@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mingw-patches@lists.sourceforge.net, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20060829114107.GA17951@calimero.vinschen.de> <20060829124525.GA13245@nevyn.them.org> <200608291459.k7TExRDT026512@greed.delorie.com> <20060829150948.GA18308@nevyn.them.org> <20060829153540.GA20893@calimero.vinschen.de> <20060829154718.GB17552@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060829160406.GB21260@calimero.vinschen.de> <20060829160923.GB20830@nevyn.them.org> <20060829164906.GC21260@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060829164906.GC21260@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Aug 29 12:09, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:04:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > On Aug 29 11:47, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > > Btw, I agree with Daniel's suggestion of using >> > > ../config/no-executables.m4 if that's possible. >> > >> > I did that first, but the argument against this is that the >> > mingw-runtime package, does not contain a top-level config directory. >> > The source tree is supposed to be built stand-alone. Therefore it's >> > required to have a stand-alone aclocal.m4 file. >> > >> > [time passes] >> > >> > Or do you mean I should just add an include(../config/no-executables.m4) >> > to winsup/acinclude.m4 and create the aclocal.m4 files from there? >> >> If you do that it'll just emit a sinclude into aclocal.m4 anyway, won't >> it? > >Hm, yes, I guess so. > >But the problem is clear I hope. If we refer to ../config/foo, the >mingw/aclocal.m4 file isn't self-sufficient anymore. That's actually >the only reason I didn't refer to ../config/no-executables.m4, but >copied it instead. As long as there's a valid aclocal.m4 in the mingw directory, I wouldn't think it would matter but that's a decision for the mingw folks, I think. The mingw-patches and cygwin-patches mailing lists are in the To: above. I apologize for posting to a closed list but I thought that this was also something that needed to be seen there. Daniel, FWIW, I added you to the allow list in cygwin-patches so your email shouldn't bounce there anymore. cgf