From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26339 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2006 16:09:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 26321 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Aug 2006 16:09:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:09:30 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GI69T-0005Th-NB; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:09:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:01:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mingw-patches@lists.sourceforge.net, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Simplify MinGW canadian crosses Message-ID: <20060829160923.GB20830@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mingw-patches@lists.sourceforge.net, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20060829114107.GA17951@calimero.vinschen.de> <20060829124525.GA13245@nevyn.them.org> <200608291459.k7TExRDT026512@greed.delorie.com> <20060829150948.GA18308@nevyn.them.org> <20060829153540.GA20893@calimero.vinschen.de> <20060829154718.GB17552@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060829160406.GB21260@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060829160406.GB21260@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:04:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 29 11:47, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Btw, I agree with Daniel's suggestion of using > > ../config/no-executables.m4 if that's possible. > > I did that first, but the argument against this is that the > mingw-runtime package, does not contain a top-level config directory. > The source tree is supposed to be built stand-alone. Therefore it's > required to have a stand-alone aclocal.m4 file. > > [time passes] > > Or do you mean I should just add an include(../config/no-executables.m4) > to winsup/acinclude.m4 and create the aclocal.m4 files from there? If you do that it'll just emit a sinclude into aclocal.m4 anyway, won't it? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery