From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16193 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2006 20:32:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 16185 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2006 20:32:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:32:44 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GDS49-0000Dt-W4 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:32:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Flash support part 3: documentation Message-ID: <20060816203241.GA403@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200607201343.32483.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200607211604.02942.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200607221640.31522.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200607221640.31522.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 FYI, I looked over this patch again today; except for minor nits below, it still accurately describes the other two flash patches. This covers the usage and protocol sides, and only the bits in the middle have changed. On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 04:40:31PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > +To be able to write into flash memory, @value{GDBN} needs to obtain > +memory map from the target. This section describes the format of the > +memory map. "obtain a memory map"? > + + PUBLIC "+//IDN gnu.org//DTD GDB Memory Map V1.0//EN" > + "http://sourceware.org/gdb/gdb-memory-map.dtd"> This URL is not yet valid. Once the flash patches are merged, let's remember to make it valid; any DTDs should be available from the GDB web site. Automatic XML validation tools will use that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery