[RFA/testsuite] Adjust step-bt testcase

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 347 bytes --]

Hello Daniel,

  re: http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2006-08/msg00079.html

Would the attached patch fix your problem?

2006-08-09  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

        * gdb.base/step-bt.exp: Make hexadecimal address option in
        expected output of the backtrace commands.

Tested on x86-linux, no regression.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: step-bt.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 889 bytes --]

Index: step-bt.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-bt.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 step-bt.exp
--- step-bt.exp	8 Aug 2006 21:50:54 -0000	1.1
+++ step-bt.exp	10 Aug 2006 04:10:02 -0000
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ gdb_test "stepi" \
          "step first instruction"
 
 gdb_test "bt" \
-         "#0 +0x\[0-9a-z\]+ in hello .*#1 +0x\[0-9a-z\]* in main.*" \
+         "#0 +(0x\[0-9a-z\]+)? in hello .*#1 +0x\[0-9a-z\]* in main.*" \
          "backtrace after first instruction step"
 
 gdb_test "stepi" \
@@ -71,6 +71,6 @@ gdb_test "stepi" \
          "step second instruction"
 
 gdb_test "bt" \
-         "#0 +0x\[0-9a-z\]+ in hello .*#1 +0x\[0-9a-z\]* in main.*" \
+         "#0 +(0x\[0-9a-z\]+)? in hello .*#1 +0x\[0-9a-z\]* in main.*" \
          "backtrace after second instruction step"