From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17534 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2006 20:24:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 17526 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Aug 2006 20:24:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:24:24 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1GAY7g-0007tg-S0; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:24:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] Remove all remaining gdb_suppress_entire_file Message-ID: <20060808202420.GA30302@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20060721002619.GE1499@adacore.com> <200607212205.k6LM5sNC003058@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060721232842.GA30038@nevyn.them.org> <20060808190052.GG24779@nevyn.them.org> <200608082010.k78KAB1h005794@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608082010.k78KAB1h005794@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:10:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Hmm, I guess what I really want is an UNTESTED if the failure was to > be expected (for example the ADA tests if there is no ADA compiler on > the system) and an error if something went wrong that shouldn't have > gone wrong (an ICE from GCC on one of the testsuite code snippets). > However, there probably isn't always a clear distinction between the > two. For example, do we expect C++ snippets to compile on all > systems? I suppose Joel's patch is progress; we can always tweak > things later if we feel the UNTESTEDs are inappropriate. Sounds good to me. We do expect most of the tests to compile on most systems, except for those with "strange" dependencies - meaning everything but C and C++ and anything with threads. But I don't see a good way to capture this information that isn't more trouble than it's really worth. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery