From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31088 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2006 20:02:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 30875 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2006 20:02:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:02:11 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k71K257Y010021; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:02:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k71K25G0025397; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:02:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k71K24kH023633; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:02:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200608012002.k71K24kH023633@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: rearnsha@arm.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <1154429362.16426.54.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> (message from Richard Earnshaw on Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:49:23 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Fix returning small structs on OpenBSD/arm References: <200607192125.k6JLPmuV014206@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1154429362.16426.54.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 > From: Richard Earnshaw > Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:49:23 +0100 > > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:25, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > On OpenBSD/arm, all structures are returned in memory, i.e. the > > -fpcc-struct-return GCC option is the default. There are a couple of > > different ways we deal with pcc/reg struct return in GDB. This adapts > > the way things are done on i386 and m68k. This makes it easy to > > provide a user command to switch from one convention to the other like > > i386 already has. However, right now I don't actually see much reason > > to add that option on arm. > > > > Anyway, this shaves another 80 failures from the testsuite on > > OpenBSD/arm. > > > > ok? > > > > Yes, this is fine, thanks. Thanks, Committed