From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17940 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2006 21:31:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 17930 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jul 2006 21:31:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from public.ninemoons.com (HELO public.ninemoons.com) (24.248.2.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:31:22 +0000 Received: from [::1] (public.ninemoons.com [24.248.2.174] (may be forged)) by public.ninemoons.com (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6OLUdBE002616; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:30:41 -0700 From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@diveadx.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix inconsistent usage of FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC macro Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: GDB Patches References: <200607241705.37217.fnf@ninemoons.com> <20060724211008.GA18103@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060724211008.GA18103@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607241730.39390.fnf@ninemoons.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 On Monday 24 July 2006 17:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I gather you didn't test Alpha. This patch is wrong. Yes, it's pretty obviously wrong. My mistake. I started with a patch that wasn't so obviously wrong and expanded it at the last minute to include the alpha bits. I'll revise and submit. -Fred