From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27165 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2006 20:38:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 27154 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2006 20:38:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fios.cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:38:49 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 6437213C2DE; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:38:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:38:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfa] Allow building a cross Cygwin / MinGW debugger Message-ID: <20060721203847.GA9486@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060718194057.GA25803@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060718194057.GA25803@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:40:57PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >I'm about to post Windows native support for gdbserver. While testing it, I >needed a cross debugger from some other platform to Windows; you can almost >build one today, but not quite. This patch fixes that up, by removing an >error and some bits of DLL support. > >Of course the cross debugger doesn't have DLL support; neither does the >remote protocol. I've recently implemented DLL support for a remote target >and will be submitting that soon; at that point, I could allow Windows >gdbserver to report DLL events just like a native debugger. > >Does this look OK? I don't see anything controversial here. It's nice to see the deprecated stuff disappear. Please checkin if you haven't already. Thanks. cgf