From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14399 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2006 00:43:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 14390 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2006 00:43:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:43:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CF648CEA8 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:43:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11318-01-2 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:43:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (S0106000f3d96cb6d.vc.shawcable.net [24.84.195.170]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEAB48CE93 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:43:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id C416147EFA; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Fix a C++ segfault Message-ID: <20060721004329.GC3711@adacore.com> References: <20060720225443.GA31345@nevyn.them.org> <20060721002757.GA3711@adacore.com> <20060721004035.GB802@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060721004035.GB802@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2 > > > 2006-07-20 Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > > > * eval.c (evaluate_struct_tuple): Skip static fields. > > > > I don't know C++ too much - how often is this likely to occur? > > Would this be a safe patch for the branch? > > Safe, but not particularly relevant. None of this code has been used > in years, it's quite clear - in fact 80% of that function is devoted to > Chill support. OK, so I won't bother putting it in the branch. Thanks! -- Joel