From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-45024-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24985 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2006 02:17:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 24977 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2006 02:17:52 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:17:50 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) 	id 1G31dE-0001cg-Ic; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:17:48 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:17:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rft/symtab] Check the sizes of minimal symbols
Message-ID: <20060719021748.GB6055@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <20060707035420.GA8071@nevyn.them.org> <200607092026.k69KQKQg027664@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060709203557.GA21606@nevyn.them.org> <200607112200.k6BM0nQT004757@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060711224806.GA1686@nevyn.them.org> <200607132323.k6DNNlZR025682@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200607132323.k6DNNlZR025682@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:23:47AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:48:06 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:00:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Yes it does.  No regressions on OpenBSD/i386.  I'll try some of the
> > > other architectures as well later this week.  Any in particular that
> > > you'd like to see tested?
> > 
> > Nothing jumps out at me; the things that seem likely to be a problem
> > are e.g. hppa/ia64/ppc64.
> 
> Well, I checked OpenBSD/sparc64, OpenBSD/mips64 and OpenBSD/powerpc,
> and didn't see any regressions.  I'd say, go ahead and commit this,
> and hope it doesn't break any of hppa/ia64/ppc64.

Done.  If anyone encounters strange symbol-related problems, be sure to
let me know!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery