From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24960 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2006 18:07:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 24951 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2006 18:07:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:07:41 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6HI4w2W007943; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6HI4wW2013887; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:04:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k6HI4wTu030509; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:04:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200607171804.k6HI4wTu030509@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: nathan@codesourcery.com CC: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dan@codesourcery.com In-reply-to: <44BBA841.3040008@codesourcery.com> (message from Nathan Sidwell on Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:09:53 +0100) Subject: Re: add vector container type References: <44B2273D.9030906@codesourcery.com> <24259.192.87.1.22.1152532444.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <44B690FA.6000006@codesourcery.com> <44B7C4DF.50003@codesourcery.com> <44BBA841.3040008@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:09:53 +0100 > From: Nathan Sidwell > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:22:55 +0100 > >> From: Nathan Sidwell > >> CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > >> dan@codesourcery.com > >> > >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, it's okay, but please fix the following gotchas: > >> Is this ok now? > > > > Yes, thanks. > > For avoidance of doubt, Eli is approving that the documentation patches are ok. > Approval for the whole patch is still pending. > > Mark -- do you need anything more than Dan's comments? Would having a patch > that used the vec.h file make a difference? I'm certainly curious about it. In any case I'd like to request not to check in the vector stuff before we have reviewed any code that uses it. Nothing personal; GDB has had quite a bit of code (and probably still has some) that's not really used. Getting this stuff reviewed at an early stage is defenitely a good idea though. Mark